Skip to secondary navigation Skip to main content

Human Capital, Culture, and Leadership - Government-wide Section 508 Assessment Criteria

Human Capital, Culture, and Leadership

This section asks about your reporting entity's leadership and professional development, and how ICT accessibility is integrated into mission-related strategic planning.

Question 43

Indicate to what extent ICT accessibility is included as a core value in reporting entity DEIA and/or mission-related strategic planning. (*Required)

Select one:

  1. No defined ICT accessibility related goals or objectives included
  2. Reporting entity plans to update ICT accessibility core values in the DEIA and/or mission-related strategic plan in the next strategic plan update (less than 5 years)
  3. Reporting entity is expected to update ICT accessibility core values in the DEIA and/or mission-related strategic plan in the next strategic plan update (1-3 years)
  4. Reporting entity is currently updating ICT accessibility core values in the DEIA and/or mission-related strategic plan in the next strategic plan update (less than 1 year)
  5. ICT accessibility core values have been included in the reporting entity DEIA and/or mission-related strategic plan, and leadership regularly communicates this core value
  6. Unknown

Question 44

Indicate if Section 508 compliance is included in reporting entity ICT-related leadership and management performance plans. (*Required)

Select one:

  1. No, and has no plans to do so
  2. No, but reporting entity has a timetable to begin implementation
  3. Yes, for some ICT leadership and management performance plans (approximately 1%-50%)
  4. Yes, for a majority of ICT leadership and management performance plans (approximately 51%-89%)
  5. Yes, for all or almost all ICT leadership and management performance plans (approximately 90% or more)
  6. Unknown

Question 45

How often are ICT accessibility skills and capabilities integrated into competency and professional development planning for reporting entity staff who are responsible for ensuring ICT is accessible? (*Required)

Select one:

  1. Never (0% of the time)
  2. Sometimes but generally on an ad hoc basis (approximately 1%-24% of the time)
  3. Regularly (approximately 25%-59% of the time)
  4. Frequently (approximately 60%-89% of the time)
  5. Almost always (approximately 90% or more of the time)
  6. Unknown

Staff who are responsible for ensuring ICT is accessible may include:

  • Contracting Officers,
  • Contracting Officers’ Representatives,
  • Designers,
  • Developer,
  • Testers,
  • IT Project Managers and leadership,
  • Digital content managers,
  • Communications professionals,
  • Instructional designers, or
  • Section 508 Program Managers.

This question is very broadly asking how the reporting entity identifies who is responsible for ensuring ICT is accessible and how the reporting entity is building accessibility knowledge and competency into those roles to ensure creation of accessible content.

Question 46

How often does the reporting entity's Section 508 program (or equivalent) engage with disability-related affinity groups (external or internal to reporting entity) to inform ICT accessibility program maturity? (*Required)

Select one:

  1. Never
  2. Sometimes but generally on an ad hoc basis (1-2 times a year)
  3. Regularly through scheduled interactions (3-4 times a year)
  4. Frequently through scheduled interactions (5-6 times a year)
  5. Affinity groups have an active voice and role in ICT accessibility considerations and are engaged through scheduled interactions 7 or more times a year or interactions are integrated into development lifecycle feedback loops
  6. Unknown
  7. N/A - reporting entity does not have a Section 508 program or equivalent

Reviewed/Updated: April 2024

Section508.gov

An official website of the General Services Administration

Looking for U.S. government information and services?
Visit USA.gov