Skip to secondary navigation Skip to main content

Common Accessibility Risks in Low-Code Authoring Environments and Content Management Systems

Low-code tools simplify publishing, but they also introduce recurring risks. Below are the most common accessibility risks.

Tip: Always preview content before publishing.

Accessibility Considerations for AI-Assisted Content Creation

Many modern content management systems and low-code platforms include artificial intelligence (AI) capabilities that can generate content, summarize information, suggest alternative text, create forms, generate metadata, or assist with publishing workflows.

AI-generated content may improve efficiency but should be reviewed before publication.

Potential accessibility risks include:

  • Incorrect or incomplete alternative text.
  • Improper heading structures.
  • Ambiguous link text.
  • Inaccessible form structures.
  • Content that does not adequately support users with disabilities.

Authors remain responsible for ensuring accessibility, regardless of whether content is created manually or generated through AI-assisted tools.

Accessibility of Automated Content and Workflows

Low-code environments often generate content automatically through workflows, notifications, approvals, dashboards, reports, and email communications.

Accessibility considerations should extend to:

  • Automated email notifications.
  • Generated reports and dashboards.
  • Workflow status messages.
  • Approval interfaces.
  • System-generated documents.

Agencies should periodically review automated outputs to verify that accessibility requirements continue to be met as workflows evolve.

Copy-and-Paste Formatting Problems

Content pasted from Word, PowerPoint, or external websites can introduce accessibility defects such as invalid markup, empty headings, inline styling issues, and improperly formatted lists.

After pasting content:

  • Review and clean up formatting as needed.
  • Reapply proper structure using CMS built-in styles and tools.
  • Review heading hierarchy and lists for accuracy.

Drag-and-Drop Layout Problems

Visual page builders may create:

  • Incorrect heading structures.
  • Poor keyboard navigation.
  • Reading order issues.
  • Empty containers.
  • Non-semantic markup.

Authors should verify that visual layouts also produce logical HTML structure.

Embedded Third-Party Content

Embedded tools and widgets may not meet accessibility requirements. Some examples include maps, dashboards, social media feeds, media players, scheduling tools or surveys.

Before embedding third-party content:

  • Evaluate accessibility support.
  • Review Accessibility Conformance Report (ACR) documentation.
  • Conduct Section 508 conformance testing.
  • Prohibit use of inaccessible third party content.

Reusable Components with Accessibility Defects

A reusable component can spread accessibility issues across multiple pages.

Examples include:

  • Logos without alternative text.
  • Inaccessible accordions.
  • Carousels without keyboard access.
  • Forms missing visible or programmatic labels.
  • Modals without visible focus.
  • Repeat headers or footers with accessibility issues.

Before broad deployment:

  • Test reusable components for accessibility; remediate components as needed.
  • Establish approved component libraries.
  • Prohibit use of inaccessible components.

Resources

Reviewed/Updated: July 2026

Section508.gov

An official website of the General Services Administration

Looking for U.S. government information and services?
Visit USA.gov