Integrating Section 508 conformance data, such as test reports or Accessibility Conformance Reports (ACR) into IT product portfolios—like asset and application inventories or Governance, Risk, and Compliance (GRC) tools—is crucial for ensuring Section 508 conformance across an agency’s digital ecosystem. Effective execution of these practices supports informed procurement decisions, facilitates audits, strengthens governance, and enhances risk management, all while optimizing documentation storage.
Asset Inventory Tools
Federal agencies track their information and communication technology (ICT) in an inventory of information systems and each agency may have a different name for their inventory, asset management system, or model. Regardless of the specific system, Section 508 conformance should be integrated. This integration enables users to easily determine if a product is conformant and identify any existing barriers to accessibility.
Consider updating the inventory to include the following fields:
A new test report, demonstrating Section 508 conformance of the version currently in use, should be acquired and linked within the tracking tool whenever a product is updated to a new version.
Tip: All Section 508-related data fields should be reviewed by a designated accessibility compliance officer such as the agency's Section 508 Program Manager, member of the Section 508 Program or other designee, or control owner before entry is finalized. Agencies should establish periodic data quality checks to ensure records reflect an accurate and current conformance status of each ICT product.
GRC Tools
Federal agencies utilize Governance, Risk, and Compliance (GRC) tools to centralize, standardize, and automate the management of policies, risks, audits, and compliance activities.
While the exact GRC tool or platform may vary, most allow:
By aligning Section 508 controls with existing digital policy mandates such as Modernizing the Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program (FedRAMP) (M-24-15), agencies can unify information and communication technology (ICT) accessibility with IT governance. Where possible, agencies should align Section 508 controls with related compliance domains, such as information security, privacy, and records management, to enable unified workflows and reduce duplication of compliance activities. Integrating Section 508 into the agency’s GRC tools ensures ICT accessibility is not treated as an afterthought, but rather as a managed and measurable part of the agency’s overall risk and compliance posture. Per M-24-15 agencies should “[e]nsure that agency governance, risk, and compliance (GRC) tools and system inventory tools can produce, transmit, and ingest machine readable authorization artifacts using OSCAL or any succeeding formats as identified by FedRAMP”.
Agencies must ensure GRC and inventory tools themselves meet Section 508 requirements. This includes conducting accessibility testing of the platforms, reviewing vendor ACRs, and documenting alternate access methods if full conformance is not possible.
The following table outlines the integration of Section 508 considerations into GRC tools, detailing the actions, steps, and expected outcomes.
Action | GRC Integration Steps | Expected Outcome |
---|---|---|
Update IT and digital service governance policies to include Section 508 requirements. |
|
Section 508 becomes a tracked policy with associated controls and oversight. |
Add ICT accessibility or Section 508 compliance as a specific risk type or sub-risk category under IT risk. |
|
Section 508 risks are visible and evaluated in enterprise risk frameworks. |
Develop and document controls specifically aligned with Section 508 Standards. |
|
Section 508 becomes part of internal control frameworks and audit readiness. |
Require evidence of Section 508 conformance at key software development lifecycle (SDLC) phases. |
|
Section 508 becomes a condition for development and change control approvals. |
Use integrations with scanning tools or test report applications to feed test results into GRC dashboards. |
|
Continuous monitoring supports proactive Section 508 compliance. |
Designate responsible roles in the GRC tool for ICT accessibility oversight. |
|
Clear lines of responsibility reduce the risk of compliance gaps. |
Make Section 508 part of internal and external IT and system audits. |
|
Demonstrable evidence of Section 508 oversight supports Office of Management and Budget (OMB), GSA, and Department of Justice (DOJ) reporting requirements. |
Procurement Integration
Procurement teams should verify Section 508 conformance status and review test reports before awarding new contracts or renewing existing ICT procurements. The agency’s inventory of information systems or GRC system should serve as a source of record for this review, and solicitations should require vendors to provide updated accessibility conformance documentation.
Monitoring and Maintenance
Agencies should regularly monitor their IT portfolio and tracking systems to ensure governance policies and procedures are followed. It is recommended that IT is assessed every 12-36 months or on a frequency based on risk assessment of non-conformant IT, to determine if conformance status has changed. If retesting after a product update identifies significant new accessibility barriers, the agency should log the defect in the GRC system, initiate remediation workflows, and, where feasible, revert to a prior accessible version until the issue is resolved.
Related Resources
Reviewed/Updated: September 2025